3 common mutual fund misconceptions

ign="center">fund launched in 1995 can be compared with another
Few would dispute the utility that mutual funds asfund launched in 2002 over the 3-Yr and 5-Yr time
investment avenues can add to investors portfolios.frames. However comparing their since inception
Similarly, in recent times, the greater acceptance ofperformances would be inappropriate because the
mutual funds and their impressive showing in thefirst fund has a 13-Yr track record while the latter
domestic context has been chronicled in detail. Therehas been in existence for 6 years. A funds
is also a huge amount of information available on howperformance since its inception can at best be
to invest in mutual funds and make the most ofconsidered for drawing comparisons vis-à-vis the
them. Sadly, there is little being done to remove thebenchmark index (i.e. by considering a corresponding
several misconceptions doing the rounds. Thanks toperiod) to evaluate its relative performance.
these misconceptions, investors end up making3. Thematic funds make good investments
incorrect investment decisions. In this article, weThis is likely to be the most disputed misconception.
expose 3 common mutual fund misconceptions.After all, most thematic funds have delivered
1. SIP is an investment avenuesuperlative performances over the last 18-24 months.
SIP (systematic investment plan) is a buzzword ofLets not forget that just about every fund house
sorts in the mutual fund industry. Fund houses haveworth its salt is launching thematic NFOs (new fund
done their bit to spread the gospel of SIP amongoffers) and that includes fund houses like HDFC
investors. Advertisement campaigns exhortingMutual Fund which were always averse to the idea.
investors to invest via an SIP are common place.Clearly, the worthiness of thematic funds cannot be
However, many investors have been led to believedoubted.
that SIP is an investment avenue. It is notThe fact: All the hype surrounding thematic funds
uncommon to find investors who want to invest indoesn't change the fact that they are high risk-high
an SIP fund (incidentally, there was even a mutualreturn investment propositions. Furthermore, such
fund launched with that name).funds can deliver only so long as the underlying
The fact: SIP is a mode of investment, not antheme does well; once the theme runs out of steam
investment avenue. The conventional method of(every theme does at some point in time), so does
mutual fund investing entails making one-time lumpthe fund. And given the restrictive investment
sum investments. SIP investing involves makingmandate of a thematic fund, the fund manager has
regular investments in a staggered manner. Byno option but to stay invested even in the
spreading the investments over longer time framesaforementioned scenario.
(at least 12-24 months), investors stand to gain byConversely, there are diversified equity funds that
lowering the average purchase cost vis-à-vis lumpinvest in an unrestricted manner. By not being tied
sum investments. This is most evident when equitydown to any specific theme, they are free to seek
markets experience prolonged bouts of turbulence.attractive investment opportunities across the
Also, SIP investing tends to be lighter on the walletinvestment universe. Statistics reveal that over longer
as opposed to lump sum investing.time frames (more than 5 years) well-managed
2.Since inception numbers are comparablediversified equity funds are known to score over
It is a common practice to evaluate equity-orientedtheir thematic peers. More importantly, diversified
funds by comparing their performances over longerequity funds are known to outscore their thematic
time frames like 3 years and 5 years. At times,peers on the risk parameters i.e. they expose
investors are known to draw conclusions based oninvestors to lower risk levels.
since inception performances. Since inception refersAt best, thematic funds are suited for informed
to the growth clocked by a fund since its origin.investors who can time their entry into and exit from
The fact: Since inception performances are notthe fund. Retail investors should stick to diversified
comparable, simply because not all funds have theequity funds with proven track records over longer
same inception date. For example, a diversified equitytime frames and across market phases.