A Response to the Barron's Plan - A Good First Step But Not Enough

It was 1976 when I became a fan of Barron's. Thesame loan is made to a AAA borrower and the
Dow Jones Industrials were below 1,000. Mr.borrower's credit score falls, the market price of the
Ableson's wit made me laugh as he skewered theloan falls to reflect that decline in credit quality. If the
valuations that would justify a Dow above 1,000. Invalue of the asset that secures the loan falls, so
1977, the 30-year treasury was trading at a yielddoes the market price of the loan. As house prices
around 7.75% on its way to just above 15% onlyfall, the underlying security of a mortgage falls. As
four years laterpeople lose their employment, their ability to pay their
I will continue reading this august journal. However,existing mortgages evaporates.
when I read the front page editorial this weekend, IUntil housing prices stop falling, and there is a floor on
was deeply saddened. Barron's magazine holds ahousing values, the economy will continue to decline
special place among financial publications in the Unitedin a deflationary spiral. Household wealth will continue
States. The depth and breadth of its financialto be destroyed; fear and desperation will rule the
reporting is rarely matched. It has access to the bestday. The government must enact a national
and brightest minds in business and investing givingmoratorium on foreclosures. Instead of a bank
Barron's the ability to inform its readers, industryholiday, call it a foreclosure holiday: No more
leaders and government, in a unique and thoughtfulforeclosures for at least 24 months.
way. This weekend, Barron's lost an opportunity toBarron's is right to identify mortgage principal
help its readers, our leaders, and the government,modifications as a key step in healing our national
really understand the severity and complexity of theeconomic wounds. But the modifications are closer to
current crisis.50% of face value of the first mortgage and 100%
The Barron's Plan presents some bold and seeminglyof the second mortgage. If the problem were only
radical ideas. It proposes to take $200 billion of thewith the banks, this might be relatively easy to do.
TARP money and reset the principal balances ofHowever, the problem lies in the structure of the
approximately $850 billion of sub prime mortgages byresidential mortgage market and mortgage
an estimate of 25%. I applaud the ideas, but I thinksecuritizations. Mr. Laing's article clearly articulates this
they fall short of addressing and solving the difficultproblem is in the "Shadow Banking System" not just
problems we face.at the banks. As most residential mortgage
The Barron's Plan approaches the problem from thesecuritizations are structured, there is no legal way to
top down. Fix the banks; make them modifyfix troubled mortgages. The pool servicer does not
mortgages; get cash flow moving; get lendinghave clear legal authority; the pool trustee does not
restarted. The problem is that this is the old solution.have clear legal authority; the investors do not have
It won't work; it can't work. The banks are no longerthe clear legal authority; and no one can act,
the financial system, but are rather a part of theunilaterally, without significant risk of legal action.
financial system. And they are an increasingly smallerOnly the federal government can break this log jam,
part of the financial system. Like General Motors, theand Americans must demand that their government
banks do not understand that the world changedact. Most mortgage backed securitizations, holding
while they were at the party. Now they have to dealpools of mortgages on U.S. property, have U.S.
with a whole array of institutions that are not banks,domiciled trustees. This means they are subject to
but lend; that are not investors, but invest.control by the U.S. government. I strongly suggest
Increasingly these new entities are the financialthat the government mandate by law that the
system, and they are becoming a larger part of thetrustees of the securitized mortgage pools have the
system every day. They have other attributesauthority to modify, change and amend both principal
compared to traditional banks; they are global, virtualamounts and interest charges on any loans in any of
and mostly unregulated. Let me refer back to anthe pools. Further, the trustees must have the clear
earlier issue of the publication.legal authority to sell, trade, and/or exchange any
First, let's look at the February 9th issue of Barron'smortgage held in the pool. The federal government
magazine. There are two articles in particular thatmust then redraft the terms and conditions of all
warrant review. The first is by Senior Editor Jonathansecuritizations giving the trustee the power and
R. Laing, titled "Advice to Geithner: Don't Hold Back."authority to take any and all actions with respect to
Mr. Laing is absolutely correct when he says,any and all assets in the pool.
"Likewise, government purchases of banks loansIn addition, all tranches of any and all securitizations
won't send nearly as powerful a signal as buying, say,of U.S. residential mortgages must have a CUSIP
asset backed securitizations comprised of hundredsnumber. Market quotes, both bid and ask, must be
of loans diversified by issuer and geographical locale."made available through major services like Dow Jones
The second article I wish to draw attention to isin lot sizes of less than $20,000 to retail as well as
Senior Editor Sandra Ward's interview with Ray Dailo,wholesale buyers. Investors and homeowners should
chief investment officer, Bridgewater Associates,be able to see what is outstanding on the pool that
titled. "Recession? No, It's a D-process, and It Will Beholds their mortgages and bid on any of those
Long." In this interview, Ms. Ward asks two verysecurities. This will help provide liquidity to a market
important questions. "So where do things stand in thethat is locked up, where the disparity between the
process of restructuring?" and "Is a restructuring ofbid and ask is extreme. If the market value of these
the banks a starting point?"securities is less than homeowners' estimates of the
The Barron's Plan correctly identifies mortgagevalue of their homes, then homeowners have a
principal modifications as a critical first step, but itstrong incentive to buy pieces of the pool and
does not correctly identify, as does Mr. Laing, theexchange face value of the certificates for face
entities that need to be effecting thesevalue of their mortgage. And thus will liquidity be
modifications, the vast number of residentialprovided to the market.
mortgage securitizations. Where the plan speaks toNow let me comment on the economy and financial
the need for government action, it does not address,system that we do not exclusively control. We are
as does Mr. Dailo, the massive global deleveraging andpast the era of "too big to fail" and are now in the
corresponding asset devaluation that is poundingera of "too big to save." The interview with Mr. Dailo
domestic and global markets and credit. Perhaps aof Bridgewater Associates makes the global problem
panel discussion with Secretary Geithner, Mr. Dailo,quite clear-deleveraging, devaluation of assets and
and Mr. Gross of Pimco, as well as some of theglobal deflation. The current global financial system is
Round Table regulars, might be illuminating.like a large housing development facing a wild fire
The Barron's Plan comments on the need to get theracing up a canyon. In each country, its central bank
economy "back on track" and the "financial systemand regulators are like firemen assigned to specific
fixed." The plan takes a top down approach with ahouses under their jurisdiction. Rather than collectively
focus on existing banking institutions. Barron's doesfighting the larger fire strategically, they focus on
not address which economy needs to get back ontheir individual houses, seemingly oblivious to the
track? Are it referring to the economy of Generalraging destruction about to engulf them.
Motors (GM) and the mid 20th century? Or is Barron'sThe interconnectedness of global financial systems
talking about the economy of companies like GTmakes it necessary for global regulation. At the same
Solar International, Inc., (SOLR) and those of thetime everyone must understand that locking down
early 21st century? This is a question about wherefinancial markets and innovation is deeply damaging to
Barron's is focused. If Barron's is looking forward,everyone, rich and poor alike. Commerce, both local
then they need to be focused on the small andand global, depends on well functioning financial
emerging companies and entrepreneurs. Thesemarkets, fund flows, trade financing, lending, and
individuals and companies do not get bailouts. Theycredit. As all humans have, by their nature, "the
cannot get credit and necessary financing to grow.propensity to truck, barter and exchange one thing
They cannot come to Washington and ask for help.for another," so must all people have a well
Consequently, when the plan refers to fixing thefunctioning financial system. But how do we get
financial system, which system needs fixing? Is it thethere?
system of large global financial institutions and theOur global financial system needs to work within a
large global clients they serve? Or is it the system offew guiding principals: transparency, free and open
small local banks, finance companies, ventureaccess, honest and fair dealing, and strong and
investors, and individuals? Perhaps, a check the dataeffective global regulation. The market participants
on which of these groups create the most newmust have certainty that the playing field is level in all
business and jobs, might be of value.respects. No one likes to play in a rigged casino,
Part of the difficulty with "fixing the financial system"unless it is with someone else's money. The financial
is that there may be than one. There is a financialpress has a responsibility to help shape the
system and economy that is within the United Statesdeveloping dialogue and debate about what the global
and governed exclusively by state and federalfinancial system of the 21st century will look like.
governments of the United States. There is anotherBarron's magazine should lead that debate.
economy and financial system that is both within andLastly, while this shock to our economic system has
without the United States, which is governed in partbeen generated by financial excess, the next shock
by the U.S. government, but also by other sovereignmay come from elsewhere. Could Western Europe
entities. There is a financial system of regulatedsave Iceland or the United Kingdom? How would
entities and a financial system of mostly un-regulatedcommerce, industry and finance react to a pandemic,
entities. We American citizens and our governmenta devastating drought in China or India, or some
can fix the system and economy we regulate andother "exogenous event?"
control. We cannot fix the economy and financialThe Barron's Plan takes a needed step forward. It
system we do not regulate and control.does not stand up and remind everyone; citizens,
Addressing what we do control, let's first be clearbanks, and government, that we really know next to
about the nature of mortgages and the relatednothing about identifying and managing risk. And as a
structural problems. Mortgage debt is a loan securedlong time reader of Barron's magazine, I think it is fair
by title to an underlying asset. If a loan of $100,000to say that Barron's lesson to its readers over the
is made at 5% interest and the market rate goes toyears is, "If you do not understand the risk, you
10%, the loan is worth, in the market, $50,000. If thecannot understand the return.