Dot Com Crash: Whose Fault Is it Anyway?

The statistics coming off the crash in dot comfault for giving the kid avery big pocket full of
stocks are adding up to ableak picture. This week Ichange without making sure the business plan
read an editorial in Electronic News by managingeditorsaidsomething about profits before the kid retires?
Peter Brown that presented some disturbingThe VC is easily the mostmisunderstood character on
numbers. According tothe dot com scene. One of the interestingstatistics
Reuters Media, a total of 100,000 jobs have vanishedcoming from the Internet crash is that VCs are
from the Interneteconomy since December , 1999. Ahitting theirbatting averages. Most venture companies
full 50,000 of those jobs have disappearedsincedon't expect to bat much above 300.
February. In three bloody months, the dot comThat means seven out of ten of their companies are
damage has doubled. Inexpected to fail. The wordventure means big, big
April, 55 dot com companies shut their doors, which isrisk. Most of the experienced VCs met or beat
up from the Marchtotal of 44. Since January of lasttheiraverage during the dot com craze.
year, 435 Internet-based companies havefolded.Is it my fault?
More than half of these closures occurred this yearHow about the media? Oh, we hyped it all right. But
alone.we hype everything. Rightnow we're hyping the
The carnage has spread far beyond Silicon Valley.crash. The dramatic rise of the Internet bubble has
Seems much of our economyis now shaking becausebeenthe business story of my professional career. Of
of the dot com fall out. Even the majorcourse we're going to coverit with raving enthusiasm.
televisionnetworks, ABC, NBC and CBS blame theirBut remember, deep skepticism ran through
current advertising revenue woes onthe dot comthebusiness press simultaneously with the gushing
failures. Certainly Cisco, Sun Microsystems and Intelover the New Economy. Alltold, I think the business
aresuffering from fall-off in demand for theirmedia did a balanced job reporting the dot comraise
Internet-boom products. Manyobservers blame theand collapse.
downturn itself on the popping dot com bubble. IDoes all this mean I don't blame anybody? Yes,
guessthe failure of a few hundred Internet start-upspretty much. The dot comphenomenon has included
can drag down the entireglobal economy. So whoseboth successes and failures every step of the way.
fault is it?Even now, with those dire statistics of Internet
Is it the dot com executives fault?crashes, I can make a casefor the continued success
Should we blame the 26-year-old college dropoutof e-business transformation.
who was funded to the tune ofWhat about all this good news?
$15 or $20 million to develop a cool new way forDid you know that virtually every large company is
teens to communicate witheach other over the Net?still hip-deep in theprocess of re-making itself into a
We say, "Hey, how do you make any money offInternet-centric entity? More than 50percent of
bringinga bunch a kids to chat rooms and games?" Icorporate capital spending is going to information
say, how is a 26-year-old collegedropout supposed totechnology, upfrom 15 percent in 1990. Did you know
question the business model of a company that hasthe growth in consumer spending overthe Internet
beenfunded to draw audience rather than to createwill exceed 45 percent this year? Spending at travel
profits? Remember the eyeballrush? The dot comsites alonewill grow more than 50 percent. Did you
start-up kids were not given the mandate toknow the total spending over the
buildprofitable revenue streams. They were fundedInternet will exceed half a trillion dollars this year, far
to build audience. They did.beyond thecraziest dream of just three years ago?
Is it the venture capitalist's fault?In the Internet world, these are thebest of times
So does that mean it was the venture capitalists'and these are the worst of times.