Ownership of Ppp Infrastructure Projects

Ownership Of PPP Infrastructure Developmentbeneficiaries are the permanent equity holders of
Projects.such projects. The users and local dwellers should not
As a part of (PPP) Public Private Partnership inhesitate to sacrifice a small amount of their income
infrastructure development, BOOT (Build Ownto user instruments, as it facilitates more
Operate and Transfer) and BOLT (Build Operateconvenience for their mobility.
Lease and Transfer) projects are playing a vital roleWhile developing the BOOT or BOLT projects the
in the world and India too. Many projects underGovernment and the project company must consider
BOOT form are successfully implemented in manythe per capita income and standard of living of the
countries. In India many infrastructure developmentlocal population, the potential growth gained after
projects are formed under BOOT model. It wasimplementing the project in that region etc. The
identified that “user pay” instruments likecrucial deciding factor must be the probable marginal
water tax, conservancy tax, sewerage tax, fines forbenefit, which could be derived from the project. The
dumping waste, toll tax, user charge, advertisingprobable marginal benefit must yield a realistic and
rights etc will motivate the BOOT models ofreasonable service with in a comfortable period of
infrastructure projects in Water supply, Sewerage,time. If the beneficiaries are the deprived and
Solid waste, Roads, Flyovers, Bridges, Airports,economically weaker section the government must
Railway stations, Bus Terminals etc.come forward to share the project price. The
Normally Boot projects have thirty years of licensegovernment can think of combining the local
and asset will be transferred free of cost at the endmunicipalities and District Central Cooperative Banks
of the license period. In India the Gujarat maritimeto share the project price of the proposed
Board identified 10 green field sites as direct berthinginfrastructure development project in those localities.
deep draft ports on a BOOT basis, AndhraThe value and span of the network of such services
Government and Orissa Government also proposedmust be the central theme of any BOOT project.
many project under BOOT.Such values naturally stimulate the minds of the
In India the Tamil Nadu Government made anbeneficiaries (users). The beneficiaries also should feel
agreement with Larson and Tubro to construct a 28that the private capital involved in such infrastructure
Km long two lane Coimbatore bypass road. Thisprojects is the debt capital of the users and it is
would help to save 2.5 Km travel, fuel and trafficobligatory on the part of the stakeholders to redeem
free flow. The project was completed at a cost ofthe debt and a comfortable premium within a
1.04 bn and bypass started operative from Jan 19,reasonable span of time. The stakeholder’s
2000. It was maintained with all facilities includingcooperation ensures the infrastructure project
drinking water, petrol bunk and 24 hours ambulancepromoting companies that there is no commercial risk.
service. As per the agreement the L & T startedThe project companies recover the project price
collecting Toll charges, which was the only revenuefrom user charges paid by the stakeholders.
to recover the project price.The users of the bypassThe success of the infrastructure project is purely
road refused to pay the toll charges and L&T facedbased on the stakeholder’s attitude. The
a financial crisis in repayment of the loan amount tostakeholders must take the ownership in helping the
their funding agency. Even the Tamil Naduproject companies to recoup the project price in the
Government had dues in toll charges. The onlyform user charges. If the beneficiaries do not realize
user’s instrument for L & T to recover thetheir capacity in such projects it would be a “sick
project price is toll charges. They were not in ain seed” for the grooming new BOOT projects in
position to collect the accumulated dues.India for developing the infrastructure. Many BOOT
The beneficiaries must realize the primeneed of theprojects in India are struggling to find a comfortable
infrastructure development. The core beneficiariessolution in mitigating the commercial risk. The project
are the local people and tress- passers. They mustcompanies should analyze “ the duration and user
be aware of its explicit and implied value addition toinstrument” to recover the project price not only
their growth and development. The infrastructurein the light of BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio) and IRR
forms a wide network of services in the economic(Internal Rate Of Return) but also the affordability of
development of that location. In an infrastructurethe beneficiaries. The most viable technique of
project general public in that locality and the tressmitigating the commercial risk is creating the
passers are the real equity holders. They are theownership among the beneficiaries. This will result in
long-term beneficiaries of the infrastructuregaining the co-operation of the beneficiaries to give
development projects. The users of such facilitiesthe ‘user charge’ voluntarily and
should realize that infrastructure developmententhusiastically.
companies are professional service contractors and