Potential Cost Savings Associated With Legal Outsourcing

"How much can I save?" "What is the cost of legalannual law firm expense per lawyer at $161,893.
work done offshore?" "Please give me a quote for(Doubtless those expenses have increased since
100 hours per month for legal work done in India."2006, but, for the purposes of conservatism, we will
"What is your hourly rate?" "How much do youuse Altman's 2006 number in our example.) Altman's
charge for ______?" These are the questions andbreakdown included promotion ($7,136), reference
requests directed my way at the beginning of($4,655), equipment ($9,299), occupancy ($25,879),
conversation when someone contacts me aboutstaff ($55,147), paralegal ($17,911) and
sending certain legal tasks offshore for completion."other"($41,866). In the Altman survey, "other"
Regularly I advise potential clients that the firstincludes malpractice insurance premiums and
question to be asked, either of a lawyer or someonesettlements, payments to former partners, recruiting
potentially assisting in the outsourcing of a legalcosts, and other expenses not shown separately.
project, is not "how much?" Instead, at the outset,Adding the associate's share of expenses ($161,893)
determination should be made whether those whoto the associate's total earnings ($180,000) it is
would work on the project have the skills, trainingapparent that it costs the law firm a total of
and experience to complete the assignment(s) in a$341,893 to produce $400,000 in associate income.
quality fashion. This necessarily involves a clearLet's call it a $60,000 law firm profit attributable to
delineation of the proposed undertaking and thethe associate's efforts. Put in other terms, it costs
expectations of the outsourcer. Further, what arethe law firm $171 per billable hour of the associate's
the assurances of confidentiality? Can the timetime to produce $60,000 of profit.
deadline for completion be met? What about conflictsNow, assume the same 2000 hours were produced
of interest? These questions should be asked ofoffshore at a cost of, say, $75 per hour instead of
every U.S. lawyer whose services might be retained.$171 per hour. (Higher end outsourced work such as
Likewise, they should be asked of every person orlegal research or writing might cost in the range of
entity involved in outsourcing legal assignments. It$75.00 per hour, while other kinds of work such as
should be noted that offshore lawyers are notdocument review would likely be less. For purposes
licensed in the U.S. and do not provide "legal services"of our analysis, we estimate the overall offshore
or advice. Foreign attorneys, working offshore,costs toward the higher end.) The actual cost to the
complete assignments under the supervision andlaw firm for 2000 offshore hours at $75 per hour
review of qualified U.S. attorneys in generally thewould be $150,000 instead of $341,892. Further, the
same manner as paralegals, summer law clerks orlaw firm's client could be billed, say $240,000, for this
junior associates in the U.S. Indeed, the Code ofwork instead of $400,000. (Recent bar association
Professional Conduct requires such supervision.ethics advisory opinions allow for a reasonable
Cost savings achievable from outsourcing, however,supervisory fee by the law firm, providing the client is
seems to be the burning issue of the day. Large lawadvised of the off shoring and the Code of
firms, in particular, are looking for ways of cuttingProfessional Conduct, particularly Rule 1.5, is followed).
costs to maintain profitability or to even survive inThe client would happily achieve a savings of 40%,
challenging economic times. Dan DiPietro, client headwhile the law firm's profit would also likely increase.
of Law Firm Group of the Citi Private Bank, offeredMoreover, the law firm would require fewer
Storm Warnings (American Lawyer, Dec 2007) inassociates at the ever-escalating salary structure
observing "for the first time since 2001, expense(now starting at $160,000 base) for lawyers from
growth actually outpaced that of revenue fromtop tier law schools. Because of overall lower costs
January through June, depressing profit margins."and a fewer number of new associate hires, the firm
Sounding an ominous note, DiPietro observed thatwould be able to more effectively compete for a
the biggest expense increases were in associatereduced number of premier U.S. attorneys it decides
salaries and in occupancy and technology costs. Histo hire. Over time, partner equity and distributions
warning proved prophetic, as a number of old-line lawwould be shared with a fewer number of individuals.
firms closed their doors in 2008 including HellerThus, an outsourcing program for selected legal
Ehrman, Thelen LLP, and Thacher, Proffitt &assignments, carefully implemented and supervised,
Wood. Other large law firms are reducing staff andcan potentially result in greater client satisfaction and
lawyers, including de-equitizing partners. Corporateretention as well as enhanced law firm profitability.
clients are cutting the number of outside firms theyIn 2007 Mayer Brown, a 1500 lawyer Chicago based
engage, while pushing them to become morelaw firm, purged 45 equity partners. While denying
efficient. It is becoming increasingly apparent thatany sort of crisis, James Holzhauer, chairman of the
difficult decisions are on the horizon for many lawfirm, commented on the move: "It's necessary to
firms and their clients. Law firms want to retain theirmanage a law firm like you manage any kind of big
rainmakers, secure the best legal talent available andbusiness and make sure you have the right staffing
keep their profits per partner high. Clients want theirgoing forward." Outsourcing, seen by some law firms
overall costs for outside counsel reduced. How willas the enemy of law firm profits, may in fact be the
these issues be addressed, particularly in a difficultopposite. Without doubt, even if some law firms are
economic climate? Outsourcing is one way ofreluctant to change the traditional ways, their clients
potentially confronting the challenges. Thus, theare not. In August of 2007 observed that "clients are
question, how much can I save?pushing firms like Jones Day and Kirkland & Ellis
Assuming the proper initial inquires have been madeto send basic legal tasks to India." It is significant that
and adequately addressed, what are the cost savingsthis "push" came well before the global financial
reasonably attainable by an outsourcing U.S. law firmcollapse of the last quarter of 2008. Regarding law
and its clients? Answering that question necessarilyfirms, Holzhauer cautioned in March of 2007: "This
involves a comparative analysis of revenue and(law business) is to a certain extent a fragile business.
expenses. Suppose a large U.S. law firm wishes toOur greatest asset is our people. If you're not
consider outsourcing work that might otherwise beeconomically strong so that you can retain your best
performed by one U.S. associate working exclusivelypeople and attract other strong people from
for one of the law firm's corporate clients. The juniorelsewhere, a fragile business can have problems."
associate bills 2000 hours annually at the lawyer'sCorporate clients are on a mission to reduce legal
hourly billable rate of $200.00, for a total annual costcosts. Some of those clients would prefer to
to the corporate client (and income to the law firm)supervise the outsourced work in house, while others
of $400,000. The law firm's expenses chargeableapparently are content with their chosen outside U.S.
against the income produced by its associate includecounsel overseeing the offshore work. Irrespective,
the lawyer's base salary ($160,000) and bonus (saylegal outsourcing is on the table for consideration of
$20,000) plus the associate's share of overheadcost control. "How much can I save?" is a question
expenses for occupancy, support staff, benefits,being asked by those who, a few short years ago,
marketing, recruitment, technology and othernever imagined entertaining the concept of legal
expenses. In its 2006 survey, Altman Weil, theassignments being completed offshore.
well-regarded legal consulting firm, estimated average