Private Equity Deals Offer Alternate Exits to IPOs

WSJ article "IPO Obstacles Hinder Startups" offers aexecute, execute. If, however, the business does
good coverage of how IPOs are becoming tougherNOT have built-in scalability - and most don't - they
for small venture-backed companies.should absolutely NEVER go public. They should get
This raises the question, what should CEOs andacquired, and become part of a larger portfolio.
early-stage VCs do, once a company has reachedLast year, 41 start-ups backed by venture-capital
$100 M+ in annual sales? (Below this threshhold, it isinvestors became publicly traded U.S. companies,
absolutely undesirable to go public; investor courting,down from 67 in 2004 and 250 in the boom year of
ongoing investor management, Sarbanes-Oaxley1999, according to research firm VentureOne.
compliance related paperwork and massive expensesI would say, the recent numbers are much closer to
- being some key distractors ...)what they should be.
In general, by year 5 or year 6 in a company'sAfter all, how many enterprises really have built-in
history, the Series A investors, the Founders, and thescalability in their business model?
early executive team that is still around - get itchy toMost companies simply go public and then struggle,
extract some liquidity. Today, given the sophistication,giving smart investors absolutely no reason to touch
the available money, and the level of activity in thethem, and hence, giving analysts no incentive to
Private Equity industry, a late-stage / LBO fund couldcover them!
easily step in and provide the necessary liquidity.Rather, a secondary exit market for private
Liquidity, I believe, is no reason to go publicplacements of a chunk of the company's shares held
prematurely. An enterprise that has built-in scalabilityby early shareholders - is a far better alternative.
should stay private, stay on course, and execute,