R&D, Solar Panels and Feed-In Tariffs

George Monbiot's recent guardian article got mefunding. For this reason, many promising technologies
thinking about the nature of research andnever make it out of universities at all.
development in the photovoltaic industry and howThe painful truth is that the scale-up process is
R&D has been impacted by feed-in tariffs in Europe.absolutely critical to getting a technology onto the
Having worked in photovoltaic research both in amarket. Without this step you may as well not have
university laboratory and industry I have somebothered inventing the technology in the first place. I
experience of R&D. The field of photovoltaicsknow from experience that there are hundreds of
certainly falls into the category of applied research,extremely exciting new types of solar cells sitting
meaning that the ultimate goal is not only to gainwaiting in laboratories around the world. The
new knowledge, but to bring new products onto thebottleneck is and always has been raising finance for
market that improve the world around us. To achievethe expensive scale-up process.
this however, there is a long journey that must beIn the last few years however, since 2004-5, there
undertaken - getting a new technology onto thehas in fact been a remarkable inflow of venture
market is a multi-stage process.capital money in solar energy. Certainly not all, but
Of course every new idea is different, and no newmany solar companies have managed to raise money
technology undergoes the same journey (whateverto take their technologies from the lab to
people say, there is no clear line between the termsmanufacturing. Venture capitalists (particularly from
'research' and 'development'). There are someSilicon Valley) and corporations across the world have
features however, that are common in technologypoured billions into the hands of solar cell scientists to
commercialization processes:take their technology on to the next step.
At the beginning is painstaking fundamental researchWhat caused this sudden surge in investment in solar
in a laboratory. This may not even involve making aenergy? Certainly it wasn't a shortage of
prototype but for example may simply consist ofrevolutionary ideas for solar cells - the concepts that
measuring an effect in some new material. Many,were given financing have been around since the
many ideas are proposed, tried and rejected for1970s. My belief is that it was a direct result of the
every idea that makes it past the first step. This isGerman feed-in tariff that was implemented in its
the most creative part of the process, which is whycurrent form in 2004, shortly before the investment
it attracts so many brilliant minds, but the most thatfrenzy began.
can be achieved here in real terms, is someAlmost overnight, Germany became the single largest
suggestion that a concept has a chance in thesolar energy market in the world, and has remained
outside world.so ever since. In 2009, over 60% of all the world's
From the initial conception of a new technology,solar panels were installed in Germany. The feed-in
extensive tests must be carried out in the lab totariff guarantees a market for solar energy products
show feasibility of the idea. Once all the tests thatand this is exactly what investors are looking for to
can be done in a laboratory have been done, it isreduce the risk of a new technology. There will
time for the research to outwards and beyond, andalways be technical risk, but the feed-in tariff means
into the development stage. The challenge is to takethat at least if a new technology does work,
the small-scale prototype closer and closer to whatinvestors can be sure there will be someone to buy
might be considered a real product using a realit.
manufacturing process. In the photovoltaic cells,Many of these internationally funded new solar panel
those made in the laboratory are often tiny (smallercompanies decided to build their first production lines
than a postage stamp) and fabricated using methodsin Germany. Examples of such companies are First
that are totally unsuitable for large-scale production.Solar, Nanosolar, Avancis, Q-Cells, Sunfilm, Signet
Laboratory research however, is relatively verySolar, ErSol, Johanna Solar... I could go on. Each of
cheap compared to the later stages of development.these companies has raised hundreds of millions of
The big hurdle for scientists is to find the money todollars to build factories that produce new types of
pay for the next step in the development journey.solar panels. Even the companies not located in
Whilst more money in basic research is alwaysGermany have all open their first sales office there.
welcome, there are a number of defined fundingOf course not all these companies will be successful,
bodies that scientists can apply to for laboratoryin fact Sunfilm recently announced it would go into
research. UK universities have so far been fairlyadministration, but that is the nature of developing
successful in attracting funding to expand researchtechnologies. The process of designing and inventing
for renewable energy research in recent years. Whata new factory, and then using it to make good
is much less clear however, is who will pay for thereliable solar panels takes such a long time. Despite
later stages of development when a technology isthis, First Solar has just entered the S&P500 with
ready to leave the lab, but still has someway to gobillions in annual revenue, and several others are in
before it is proven on a large scale. Often there aretheir footsteps. There is risk, but without trying you
a lot of big technical challenges to go from small todon`t have a chance. The prize is great for those
large-scale manufacturing, and one can never be surewho succeed, and often the experience an expertise
that it will be viable at all until you try. With newgained in failure is not without value.
types of solar cells, often this expansion happens inMy opinion is that the feed-in tariff is great for
several stages, with multiple, progressively largerencouraging investment in the scale-up stage of
production lines being built. It can get VERYR&D, which is very poorly funded in the UK.
expensive.Laboratory research will continue, and governments
This gradual scaling up of a laboratory process is notshould not cut back spending on universities.
usually paid for by government sponsored R&DHowever, if a government wants this early stage
programs - building a manufacturing plant is seen as aresearch to eventually make an impact on the
commercial exercise. Scientists are therefore forcedeconomy, they have to find a way to support
to go to the private sector and do battle withexpansion stage R&D, and introducing a feed-in tariff
venture capitalists and the like to get the necessaryis very good way to do this.