Strategies To Improve Corporate Governance

Boards of directors should use the "Great Recession"Board to challenge a CEO's compensation or highly
as an opportunity to upgrade corporate governancedesired M&A transaction when the CEO is sitting in
practices. Though they should not bear fullthe room? Though theoretically possible and required
responsibility for the recent economic meltdown,per a board's mandate, this is socially very difficult to
given the importance of their role, as well as thedo. Further, meeting practices and interactions
many leaders that sit on boards, they should grabthemselves should be re-assessed, with the question
the mandate for change. Specifically, many boards ofbeing whether quarterly meetings and committee
directors need to become more knowledgeable andmeetings are truly adequate to perform the critical
engaged. This can be done by a change in boardfunctions of boards.
member composition and qualifications, by leveragingThe good news is addressing these issues is relatively
the use of external advisors and reports, by adaptingstraightforward. Specifically, boards can do all or
new meeting practices, or preferably, by all three.some of the following:
For starters, boards tend to be composed of1. Hire a team of independent analysts or consultants
executives or other leaders that are experienced,that is charged with providing reports on a company.
have been very successful, and are well-known, atThis should be done at least annually and over a
least in their specific area of expertise. Theynumber of sessions so that the analytic team can get
sometimes sit on multiple boards. These people,to know the company well. The team should focus
though qualified, are very busy and sought after byon strategic risks and opportunities, use internal and
many. They may bring prestige to a company, butexternal sources, and maintain an independent status.
are time-challenged and may not spend significantThese external advisors are valuable in that they
time on the director job. In today's complex world,provide both information as well as support for Board
experience does not preclude the need to work hardmembers in going against a managerial decision.
to be effective at most anything. Yet members with2. Promote the adoption of the recent proposal by a
the typical board member profile may find itnumber of Harvard Business School students to
challenging with their already packed schedules tomake board membership a profession that will require
devote significant amounts of time to their boardeducation and a degree. Qualified board members will
role.then make a career out of sitting on boards, making
Boards may also be composed of financial playersit more likely that they will do the homework, get
that provide funding - those that work in privatethe information they need, ask the tough questions,
equity, venture capital, and at other financial firms.and so on as the job will be their priority.
These players are some of the smartest people I3. Hire more diverse board members. Boards should
know, but generally, are most experienced in finance,recruit more diverse members in terms of gender,
as opposed to operations or other managerialnationality, and background. This does not mean
functions. On the positive side, they may spend moregetting rid of experienced members or financial
time as they often have a team of analysts that canplayers. Rather, a strong board would have a diverse
dig into data. But they often lack operationalgroup of members, each bringing unique capabilities to
experience, and when they bring in outsiders to helpthe table.
with operational or strategic issues, they also may fall4. Change board meeting practices. Specifically, I
into the "experienced-but-time-challenged" category.agree with Warren Buffet's view that
Board members are often homogeneous in terms ofnon-management board members should meet
background, gender, and nationality. Thisseparately more frequently in order to ensure that
homogeneity has been called out as a culprit for thetheir views are not overly influenced by
financial crisis, as there were many leaders with similarmanagement's and to make addressing sensitive
views and those with differing opinions were eitherissues of interest to management more socially
not around or not heard, as they were too much ofdoable.
a minority. Board members are also frequently partThere are companies that are well-governed today
of a professional or social network, for instance,as well as companies that have already have
former classmates or colleagues. This can makeimplemented some of the changes recommended
expressing differing views challenging, as it couldabove or are exploring other governance
strain relationships that bring other social orimprovements. This is all great, but it is not enough.
professional benefits.Boards should act now to step-up their performance.
Further, information packages are generally preparedVictoria Miller Nam is the President and Founder of
by company management, whereas boards representVMN Advisors Inc., a consulting and advisory firm
shareholder interests. Per classic finance theory,based in Seoul, Korea. For more information or to
these two interests at times conflict, making thecontact Ms. Miller Nam, please visit
source of the information potentially biased.Copyright 2010 VMN Advisors Inc. All rights reserved.
Finally, meeting practices are problematic. How is a