The Greatest Economic Legislation of the Last Century

As nations try to emerge from the most devastatingworld because of the number of technologies which
global recession since the Second World War,have been commercialized and subsequently
policymakers, business communities, academia, andpenetrated across the globe. The discovery of the
governments will be looking at ways to acceleratesearch engine that powers Google was done in
growth and competitiveness. Many at the right willStanford University. When Mr. Page and Mr. Brin
continue their propositions that governments shoulddecided to pursue commercialization of this algorithm
be left out of business, while those at the left willand created Google, they must have been grateful
emphasize that governments must play central rolesfor the federal funds that partly funded their
in shaping commerce and industry.discovery.
The reality is that governments do matter and aIn a recent trip to Africa, I noticed that many
single legislation could have impacts that can redesignuniversities now have Technology Transfer offices or
a nation's economic destiny. Globalization makes it sowhat they call Consults. Good idea, but I must say
important that nations must compete not just onthat the structure where those offices operate is
technologies, but on policies upon which thoseentirely different from what Bayh-Dole Act gave the
technologies are developed and commercialized.American schools. The Act is helping American
This makes it possible that two universities in twotaxpayers to reap the benefits of funding the
separate nations can develop similar technologies withacademic institutions through innovative products in
one creating Fortune 500 companies within a decadethe market. In Africa, you rarely see government in
and another having the idea locked up in a cabinet. Inthe mix of research and the whole constructs of
other words, the policies or legislations made bytechnology transfer office seems superfluous since
congress or parliament on what happens tono research takes place.
inventions supported by government funds matter.It is one of those things that happen when African
In 1980, a United States legislation dealing withprofessors visit American universities for two weeks
intellectual property emanating from federaland afterwards go home trying to recreate the
government-funded research was implemented. TheAmerican educational system. Unfortunately, the root
legislature called Bayh-Dole Act (after two Senatorscause analysis is not thought through to appreciate
Birch Bayh of Indiana and Bob Dole of Kansas thatthe fundamental evolution of what goes in the US
sponsored it) or University and Small Business Patentsystem. Yes, you have technology transfer offices,
Procedures Act gave US universities, small businessesbut the school has no electricity to run a lab.
and non-profits intellectual property rights and controlBack to the Act, notice that many US universities are
of their inventions, even though they were fundedvery competitive. While some could argue over the
by government.benefit of that since universities should traditionally
Through this Act, universities, small businesses orshare freely, the pursuit of commercialization and the
non-profit organizations could pursue ownership ofrewards that come with it help to make research
inventions in preference to the government.relevant to the needs of the society. And this new
What this means is that instead of sending thefocus has created a platform where collaboration
patents or inventions to the government agencieswith industry has reached an all-time level.
like National Science Foundation (NSF) or NationalPossibly, without this legislature, the idea that powers
Institute of Health for them to file away in theirGoogle might still be filed out someone in the NSF
office cabinets, this Act empowers the inventingcabinet. And the world will miss the dynamism,
entity to pursue commercialization of the idea. Simply,positive disruption, jobs, success-domino and
the U.S government elects to fund an idea and allowsinformation access that arrival of Google gave the
the fund recipient to profit from any invention thatworld. When they introduced 1GB gmail, Yahoo was
comes from that idea.forced to upgrade its users from 4MB to 1GB and
This Act provides clarity on many issues that couldlater, limitless storage.
derail the process of taking ideas to market,It is not just Google, there are many small companies
especially when those ideas were funded by USin pharmaceutical, semiconductor, and IT industries
federal government. For professors, it provideswhich exist today because the Act made it so easy
incentives to pursue research both for discovery andthat individuals and entities can hold rights in
for profit since they also could profit from theirpreference to government and in the process
inventions. Just as their students could discover andincrease the chance of getting innovative products to
commercialize, the university dons can also do thethe market.
same.The lesson here is that congress and parliament can
It has been a new era as the number of Technologychange the future of any nation when good policies
Transfer offices in the US universities has increasedare made.
many folds. As schools file more patents, theyI understand that this Act might have reduced the
continually look for opportunities for venture funds tofree flow of information and ideas across the
commercialize or simply license their patents to otheracademia because everyone wants to guard its ideas
institutions. These days, schools quote the number offor profit; but we have to live with the reality that
start-ups they have incubated as a metric to theirthere is nothing that does not have a potential
competitiveness. They will tell you the stories of theirdrawback. Yes, some of our professors are now
students who graduated and founded firms and usevisiting venture capitalists more often. But at the end,
that as selling points in their brochures. This isit provides a perspective that makes education
business right in the four walls of the universities.relevant and useful. And I think American students
Interesting, schools do not just teach businessare better off when their professors are not
regulation and competitiveness anymore, theydecoupled from the industry.
experience them because they are getting productsAlso, early patenting of ideas or processes without
to the market, though indirectly. There are manypursuing immediate commercialization could decelerate
start-ups which have become pipelines for the bigthe pace of their improvements from other partners.
MNCS to buyout. Before the Act, some of the ideasIn other words, when schools patent their ideas,
that enabled the start-ups might have beenthey could possibly be closing the channel of
overlooked by MNCs. But as the former showprogressive advancement on those ideas. From
promise and profitability, they could be bought overprofessors to graduate students, few will be
and that mission of making society better is given ainterested to work on ideas which have been
bigger scale.patented.
For me, Bayh-Dole Act is the most importantBut the reality is that over the last five hundred
business legislature of the last century in the Unitedyears, intellectual property rights (IPR) have proven
States. And this is American Congress at its veryto be the difference between the old world and the
best moment. It delivered through legislature andnew one and this Act cannot be an exception. A
transformed the pace of innovation by providing aworld of IPR is a world of innovation and though
fluidic system that enhances U.S competitiveness.Bayh-Dole can have some drawbacks, it is to me the
The outcome of the Act has spread around thegreatest business legislation in the last hundred years.