Valuation of Early Ventures

Traditional methods can be used to value companiesinternet. They can expand and grow globally very
with track records of revenues and profits, but theyfast compared to other sectors, that too with a
are ineffective for determining value of a start-upvery low capital base. Moreover, their gross margins
company. Too many assumptions of moving variablescan easily range between 70% and 100%, as against
make valuing early ventures using these methodscommodity companies that run on low margins.
useless.Successful ventures can either be sold to larger
Determining expected growth rate of revenue andcompanies or they can opt for an IPO. Early venture
profits is meaningless when the success of a start-upinvestors tend to determine two values; the potential
cannot be confirmed. A market may reject the newvalue at the time of next round of fund raising and
product or the regulators might not approve thethe potential value of the company at the time of
product in the first place. Moreover, several venturesexit or sale. They then determine the value of the
may be based on new ideas which are not yetventure today to get an idea of the multiple they
tested and do not have an established market.would gain. This method is referred to as 'Venture
Valuing start-ups is still important, especially forCapital Method'.
investors as it helps them in deciding the percentageFor valuing a start-up, a venture capitalist also
of ownership they will receive. Investors in earlydepends on his intuitions and knowledge and
ventures expect to gain a good multiple on theirperception about the industry. Following are some of
investment. In other words, the business should bethe important factors which the investor should
expected to reach a higher Market-to-Book ratio.examine while judging the value of an early venture:
It is normal for start-ups to lose money during initial* Valuations of comparable publicly listed companies
years. Several new technology companies which are* Addressable size of the market
internet based tend to be loss making even at the* Valuations of merger and acquisition transactions
time they are being sold. While Price to Sales can be* Gross margins of similar companies
applied, it completely ignores the operating efficiency,* Expected long run growth rate
growth rate and relative market size.* How different is the new product or service
It is generally observed that new technologySeveral start-ups launch new products and services.
companies are valued higher than companies fromIn such cases, it is difficult to judge competitiveness
other sectors like consumer products, chemical andof these ventures and valuing them based on
other manufacturing sectors. One prime factorcomparative valuations will be inappropriate. Using
distinguishing technology sector and traditional sectorsCash Flow Discounting Model would be ideal in such
is that while traditional companies face geographicalcases if it is possible to forecast future cash flows.
constraints due to product weight, jurisdiction wiseSeveral venture capitalists prefer valuing intangibles to
regulation etc; technological companies can avoidovercome the shortcomings of traditional methods.
these constraints by using third-party distributors or