Who'll Win Out - Government Intervention Or Private Enterprise for Telecom Infrastructure?

In nations with a clear digital divide, especially urban /cause. But at the end of the day any entrepreneur
rural, should governments intervene with supportwill need to assess the risk and reward (you have to
mechanisms (funding, tax breaks, direct ownership,do your due diligence here) before engaging such a
PPP's, or anything else) or take a hands-off approachventure. And of course "his" stakeholders would be
and leave it to private enterprise?keen to know details of their forecasted ROI. In
It appears today that the impact of telecomgeneral when you run some numbers, it's not that
infrastructure, especially broadband and mobileexciting for an entrepreneur to invest alone in such a
coverage, on the economy is now widely knownbusiness without seeking incentives or government's
(though I still think the definitive study on the topic isparticipation in round funding,
yet to come).The digital divide is something that is, or will become,
So, even beyond the digital divide issue, locala big issue for politicians as soon as they wake up to
governments are legitimately worried that theirthe implications of not having a high speed
territory will become less and less attractive if theinfrastructure in their constituency. You can already
digital resources aren't there. Inversely, they thinksee this in many countries but IMO very few
that they can boost their attractivity (and thereforepoliticians really understand the implications. Figures
their economy) with telecom infrastructure.from studies suggest ICT can have a positive impact
Seen in this context, it makes sense that localof between 2-4% GDP at a national and regional level
governments would want to invest in suchacross OECD countries, very important where votes
infrastructure, and in the FTTH area we are seeingare involved.
more and more examples of this approach in EuropeThe issue then surrounds how much government
(Pau, Stockholm, Amsterdam, Cologne, Hauts deshould get involved vs leaving up to the private
Seine) and in the US (Lafayette, Chatanooga, Palosector.
Alto).From reading various press articles most government
The issue is really broader than that. Private venturesinterventions become huge unwieldy burdens that
should be favoured whenever possible.....but thedeliver little in the way of progress but consume
stakes are high. Again, in the case of FTTH, themuch in the way of time, meetings and reports..... oh
attractivity that could result from a wide availability& take 5 times as long as anyone expected to
of very high bandwidth services at a national levelreach any consensus.
could potentially impact economies at the state orHowever if left purely to the private sector you run
country level. In Italy and Germany, the incumbentsthe risk on nothing being done due to the fairly short
have already stated that they would not deploysited metrics used by many service providers who
FTTH because it's too expensive for them. Supposingexpect ROI of 3-5 years or less.
a government saw this as short sighted, should theyAs in many things in life no one size fits all but some
intervene ?things can be done.
To be honest, I'm on the fence on this issue. PerhapsOver the last 12 to 24 months there have been
direct government intervention when service issignificant market developments in the provision of
available or likely to be available within a reasonablenext generation broadband globally; for example,
time frame should be discouraged. However, definingGermany is giving DT a regulatory 'holiday' to allow a
"service" is tricky.EUR3billion investment in a Fibre to the Home, in
Aat the very least governments could legislate toFrance both FT and competitors are now investing in
encourage private investment and lower the costs.fibre to apartment buildings and in Sweden such fibre
Infrastructure deployment is costly afterall. And asolutions are becoming increasingly prevalent for
good portion of that cost comes from the oftenbusinesses and residential customers alike.
nightmarish administrative aspects that slow downAnyone looking to build a network will need to
deployments (hence impairing revenues) and thusunderstand their economic, spatial and service drivers
cost a lot of money in administrative handling.as applicable to the region.
Unfortunately, it appears that countries who take aSo, the answer is ...... it depends. Government needs
completely hands off approach will pay the price into see the importance and find ways of partnering
time. They will inevitably fall behind as is currentlywith the private sector to ensure they can look
seen in the US regarding broadband.beyond the 3-5 yrs time frame. Or find some way of
Fighting against the Digital Divide is an honorablehelping the private sector to ease the pain.