Will The Sub-Prime Debacle Derail Venture Lending?

The unraveling sub-prime mortgage market hasoff from essential equity and debt capital sources.
spewed its wreckage across a vast cross section ofSimilarly, large diversified finance companies with
the financial markets. Investors and lenders continuestart-up loan portfolios reeled from mounting portfolio
to smart from massive losses on investments andlosses. Venture lending groups within Transamerica,
loans tied to this market. As some scramble toDVI and GATX eventually folded or were jettisoned
assess the implications of the sub-prime meltdown,as a result of the turmoil. Smaller, private lenders
many investors and lenders have either abandonedwere largely closed off from new funding to support
higher risk asset classes or are approaching themtheir venture transactions, forcing many of them to
with great caution.abandon lending to start-ups or to liquidate their
Residing in a far corner of the financing panoply is aportfolios. The few lenders and leasing companies
financing vehicle known as venture lending. This formthat remained gravitated to more stable segments of
of financing is used by start-ups supported bythe market. Many curbed their volume dramatically by
venture capitalists as a means of funding workingfocusing on smaller, better collateralized transactions.
capital and equipment acquisitions. A less expensiveBanks and investors that supported venture lenders
form of financing than venture capital, start-ups usealso reeled from the fallout. As several lenders either
these loans to extend the runway between equitycollapsed or faltered, the banks and investors that
rounds and to avoid ownership dilution.financed these companies realized huge losses. As a
Venture lending is in the midst of a strong reboundresult, many lenders and investors began to shun
that started in 2003. This segment is recovering fromstart-up lenders and other risky transactions.
a sharp decline that followed the bursting of theToday, havoc in the sub-prime lending market and a
'New Economy' bubble earlier in the decade. Duringpossible economic slowdown threaten to derail
the late 1990s, prior to the bubble burst, equityventure lending. Some of the same lenders and
investments in start-ups topped $100 billion. Thatinvestors who participate in the high-risk end of the
staggering amount of investment stokedsecuritized mortgage arena also participate directly or
unprecedented growth in debt transactions toindirectly in financing these lenders. These financing
start-ups, which reached almost $ 5 billion during thesources are now running scared.
same period. The technology meltdown andLastly, most lenders to start-ups rely heavily on their
economic slowdown that followed caused start-upborrowers receiving multiple equity rounds to achieve
lending to contract to around $836 million by 2003. Byloan repayment. During the technology meltdown of
2006, as the market steadily improved, loans to1999-2002, many venture capitalists focused almost
start-ups recovered to around $ 2.5 billion.exclusively on supporting the most promising
Although venture lending is rebounding, it appears ascompanies in their portfolios. The weaker portfolio
vulnerable today as it did at the beginning of thecompanies were subjected to a Dr. Kevorkian-style
decade. Earlier in the decade, a confluence of factorstriage process that saw many of them abandoned.
sent shock waves through the start-up lendingAs a result, many of these start-ups starved from
segment. Rising failures and delinquencies bythe lack of capital and failed. If this process is
start-ups, a slowing economy, a contraction inrepeated, assuming there is an economic slowdown,
venture capital investing, overaggressive lendingit could spell big trouble for venture lenders.
practices and questionable lender business modelsWill venture lending become an unwilling victim of the
sparked widespread faltering in this lending segment.sub-prime debacle -- one of the minor rail cars
Publicly-held venture lenders like LINC Capital and laterdragged by the sub-prime locomotive over the
Comdisco, that embraced this segments higher yields,proverbial cliff? Only time will tell. Much will depend on
rapid growth rate and favorable perception on Wallthe performance of the economy during 2008 and on
Street, were slammed by investors. Ultimately, thesethe responses of the banks, institutional investors,
companies foundered as their losses mounted, theystart-ups, venture capitalists and the lenders who
violated their credit agreements, and they were cutparticipate in the start-up market.